“We will not be inactive”: Right groups file a lawsuit against Trump's forbidding Donald Trump News

Washington, County Colombia – Several immigrant rights groups in the United States, as well as the US Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), have filed a case challenging President Donald Trump's ban on asylum claims.

The case is the last attempt to confront Trump Receives immigration policieswho are aimed at people who are already within the country, as well as those who seek safety from abroad.

Like other lawsuits that continue against the Trump administration, Monday complaint He claims that the president has exceeded his constitutional body and violated the existing law.

It is currently the legal asylum seekers of moving to the United States if they run away from pursuit.

“This is an unprecedented holding of power that will put countless lives in danger,” said Lee Galant, Deputy Director of the ACLU Immigrants Project, in A statementS

“No president has the authority to cancel unilaterally, the Congress of the Protection has provided those who run away from danger.”

The complaint cites domestic legislation and international contractual obligations that require the US government to allow people to apply for asylum. This includes the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).

“Through the Immigration and nationality Act, Congress has created a comprehensive legal system that allows the non -iconic to flee from persecution or torture to seek protection in the United States,” the lawsuit said.

“According to the proclamation, the government is doing exactly what Congress on the Statute has ruled that the United States should not do. He returns asylum seekers – not only lonely adults, but also families – in countries where they face pursuit or torture. “

Day a proclamation

The complaint on Monday has a direct purpose for one of the proclamations that Trump signed on the first day of his second term.

Shortly after he took office on January 20, Trump presented a document entitled “Guaranteeing the protection of countries against invasion”.

In it, he declares that undocumented immigrants “are limited to referring to Ina provisions that would allow their prolonged presence in the United States.”

The Republican leader indicated the risks of “national security” as well as the possibility of a “contagious disease” as its justification. He also claims that the southern border of the United States was “covered” with records.

“That is why I direct this entry into the United States to stop such aliens until it has noted that the invasion of the southern border has ceased,” Trump wrote.

The Republican leader has long held a firm approach to immigration, including the idea of ​​sealing the border with asylum seekers.

His offer for re -election in 2024 was determined by the same rhetoric of the fiery lane, including native allegations that the United States had been overcome by a migrant “invasion”.

Trump has repeatedly accused unsuccessful people for the woes of the country, from violence to unemployment.

Reaction

But groups like ACLU tried to return against Trump's policies using the judiciary to question their legal merit.

In the case of Monday, the case claims that Trump's proclamation not only contradicts US law, but also its obligations under international treaties.

The United States, for example, has ratified the 1967 protocol, related to refugee status, a contract that establishes refugee protection.

In a statement on Monday, Jennifer Babai, Director of Advocacy and Legal Services at the Las America Immigrant Immigrant Center in Texas, said the lawsuit shows that it and others “will not stand smoothly, as our immigration laws are manipulated “.

“Regardless of the individual beliefs of any person regarding immigration, any government attempt to grossly violate our laws is a serious question affecting all communities across the country,” Babai said.

The Texas -based group is one of the four plaintiffs in the trial, together with the Texan Civil Rights Project, the Center for Education and Legal Service for Refugees and Immigrants and the Rights and Refugee Rights Project in Florence.

A wave of legal challenges

But the immigration actions Trump took in the first weeks of his second term beyond the search for asylum.

Even in the first hours of his Presidency, Trump signed several Executive actions designed to restrict immigration and expel the undocumented people who are already in the United States.

Trump has strengthened immigration implementation activities, diverted the troops to the US border, stopped the US refugee program for 90 days and canceled an online application used by asylum seekers to schedule immigration appointments to the United States.

Some asylum seekers have been waiting for months for the meetings they booked in the app known as CBP One. Removal of the app invalid their scheduled meetings, leaving them in Limbo.

After the rights groups launched a legal challenge, calling into question the dissolution of CBP One.

Other legal challenges seek to oppose Trump's expansion of “accelerated removal processes”, which will quickly drive out of the country's untouched persons.

Others are also striving to cancel a stop-work order that has stopped financing for legal services for immigrants held in custody.

In the meantime is looking to finish Citizenship of birth in the United States.

A federal judge quickly blocked Trump's order, calling it “grossly non -constitutional.”